Monday, March 5, 2018

Our letter to the NRA (the National Rifle Association)

My organization is working to create an international government based on the US Constitution, and as of today, people in 85 nations support the plan for the international government. In 2011, the plan was leveraged to the world leaders through the diplomatic community in Washington DC. Before the Constitution can be used as the basis for the international government, certain laws and practices that create chaos in our legal system must be purified to prevent the chaos from spreading onto the international level. This is one of my organization's exempt purposes.

The international government will treat all nations the way the states are treated in the United States, and so disputes between nations will be resolved in court rather than the battlefield, and the monies wasted on war will go to the people instead. The only acceptable basis for an international court system is Universal law, because every atom in the Universe is subject to Universal Law, and every major religion is a cultural interpretation of Universal Law. No one would accept Sharia law, for example, as the basis of an international court system.

There is a misunderstanding in our legal system that we are addressing now, and it affects how our Constitutional Rights are interpreted. This misunderstanding has made it to the Supreme Court.

Most people see two levels to our legal system when there are actually three. The Universe always has three levels--the Principles, the Power and the Project. In religion, they are known as the Father, the Mother and the Son. In our legal system, they are Universal Law, Constitutional Law and Federal Law. Most people see only Constitutional Law and federal law, and this is what is leading to the chaos.

Universal law is immutable, and is based on seven principles: equality, liberty, freedom, compassion, abundance, capacity, and tolerance. These principles bring a swinging pendulum back to the straight and narrow. For example, people who have been dragged into a war lack equality, and the first requirement for conflict resolution is that everyone must be considered equal. If you consider a court case to be a mini-war, for a fair trial, both sides must be considered equal. People who have been dragged into a genocide, lack their liberty, and people who have been dragged into a massacre, based on covert and overt actions--like the school shootings--lack their freedoms.

Constitutional law is not fixed. It is evolutionary, and it is the power level, so it involves the use of power and the abuse of power. If you see only two levels, and the principles are left out, it swings the pendulum further out and people can justify playing power games that go against Universal Law. An act can be considered constitutional, but it is not lawful based on Universal Law. That is when an oppressive government can justify taking from the people our unalienable rights, to be able to live our lives without interference, to be treated fairly and equally, and to have a voice in our government.

Federal law must be based on a combination of both Universal Law and Constitutional law or it creates chaos in our legal system.

Your organization is working to protect our 2nd Amendment Rights bear arms to protect American freedoms, but there are some legal glitches in your justifications because they are based on this misunderstanding.

You are running an ad, for example, where a woman is about to burn a copy of the New York Times, but stops and calls what it prints to be fake news. Two power games are based on weaving an illusion--genocide and slavery. Once the grand lie has been told, the truth doesn't overcome the lie. It just reaches the point where no one knows who to trust. By undermining the New York Times, you are playing the power game of genocide, and denying others their liberty and taking away the Freedom of the Press, which can lead to massacres. You are breaking Universal Law of Cause and Effect, and that will lead to backlashes to your power games. 

Saturday, February 3, 2018

Was it a war, a genocide or a genocide?

Memo fever is epidemic in Washington DC, and today there is a question of whether Donald Trump will use the memo as the justification for firing Rod Rosenstein. As the president of the United States, he has the right to fire the the Deputy Attorney General of the United States, who is responsible for the special prosecutor, but it must be for cause. Does the newly declassified memo show cause? If it doesn't, Donald Trump can be impeached by Congress.

As this drama unfolds in Washington DC, let's all step back to another time, and compare this time period to the run-up to the Iraq War. According to our Light Source Invention, this is the third cycle, and the power games that are being played have reached their most extreme levels. North Korea has unified with South Korea for the Olympics, but can it last once the Olympics has ended? If Kim Jong Un is innocent now of the charges against him, it will collapse Donald Trump's justification to go to Congress for authorization to use military force.

President Bush went to Congress and received authorization to use military force against Saddam Hussein. Congress had voted to put sanctions on Iraq, and was monitoring whether the sanctions were working, so it should have come as a shock to them to hear that Saddam Hussein was working on his nuclear power program. Bush also went to the United Nations to draw together the support he needed to wage war on Iraq. He justified it with the vial of yellowcake from Niger.

It was a vial of yellowcake, a vial of yellowcake, and a vial of yellowcake, but did that vial of yellowcake prove that Saddam Hussein was rebuilding his nuclear power program, and had the intent to use his "newly manufactured nuclear weapons" against the United States? Was it the justification to preemptively strike Iraq?

George W. Bush declared Saddam Hussein to be "Axis of Evil," and he said "After all, he tried to kill my father." No one has the right to judge another, and this was an act of revenge for what he supposedly did to his father, George HW Bush. The judgment and revenge against Saddam Hussein means that the conflict devolved not as a war, but as a genocide, and it drew in his father, who believed he had the right to put Saddam Hussein down, which led to the Gulf War.

Genocides are based on weaving an illusion. The truth doesn't overcome the lie. It just reaches the point where no one knows who to trust. It created the schism between the Republicans and Democrats that is tearing apart Congress today. When no one knows who to trust, and only thing you can trust is Universal Law. It brings the swinging pendulum back to the straight and narrow.

Iraq and North Korea have not been treated equally in the United Nations, nor in U.S. foreign policy. Both The UN and US foreign policy have proven they cannot end or prevent wars, but have dragged mankind to the edge of the abyss that is nuclear war. The next step is to deny Iraq and North Korea  their unalienable rights, which are to be able to create their lives without interference, to be treated fairly and equally,  and to have a voice in their government. By doing that, under Universal Law, the people of the United States are facing the backlashes by losing our unalienable rights.

We are being backed into the corner by Russian interference in our elections. We cannot continue to be squeezed and we cannot come out of the corner fighting a greater force, which includes Russia and China. At this point, we are in a dilemma, and the solution to every dilemma is to turn around and go through the little door at the back of the corner. That is to do what is in everyone's best interest.

It is time for the people of the United States to join the debate on the plan for the international government. Today, we launch our U.S. Constitutional Amendment drive and will start gathering names on petitions for Congress to convene a Convention of States--an Article V amendment convention.

Next month, we will focus on Iraq, and we will assume responsibility for undoing the damage that was done when the United States invaded Iraq.