Sunday, September 23, 2018

Letter to Senator Wyden: Reforming Elections

The United States must start to address election reforms, first to protect our elections from Russian interference, and second, due to a sociological process known as Armageddon, it may be difficult for any major party candidate to get a  majority of the votes. The Republicans are facing this now with Trump's approval ratings hovering in the 30's, but the same thing is occurring in the Democratic Party.  In the last election, independent voters were warned not to vote for a third party candidate, and independents and moderate Conservatives were told they had to vote for a candidate who they didn't necessarily want and trust because they had to protect the US Supreme Court. 

My organization is working to create an international government based on the US Constitution, and one thing that we must address on the international government is how to hold elections, a plan that functions on a far higher level than the existing structure of any nation. With such a diversity of existing ways that officials are elected to office, what is the highest form?

We believe the highest form of elections is when anyone can run for president, and no donations or contributions are allowed. Nonprofits can hold debates and media can offer free space to candidates. Presidential elections will be held similar to tournaments--first on the local level, where candidates must offer plans that benefit everyone, and then state, regional and national levels, and candidates will progress by offering plans for each of the levels. The international government will have two presidents, and they will stand back to back, with one addressing the national level and the other, the international level. The international candidate must also solve the problems, because the same crises occur on every level.

The preemptive strike on Iraq triggered a schism around the world. It started the World Peace Movement, and every movement divides the people  into four segments--those who stands on the principles, those who have been financially affected, those whose lives have been affected and those who function for their own interests. This occurred on a global basis first, and then within nations, then within parties, and this continues to separate the people down to the individual level. As it separates, there may be some crossovers, but eventually, all candidates will hover around 25%. Any elected official knows the independents sway the election. That final 25%--the ult-rights and ult-lefts--can start rebellions.

No elected official has ever been able to get enough support to reform campaign financing to be more fair, or term limits, or a balanced budget. Attempts to go the Article V constitutional amendment route have failed. The only way that successful campaign reform can be enacted is by turning responsibility over to the States and the People through Article V, but limit the debate to the proposed international government. Everyone on the planet will be included in the debate.

Our founding fathers used a tool during debates that allowed them to reach a very high level. They "stormed the mountain." One would make a statement, and others would build and improve on it to the point where everyone agreed and was willing to carry the idea forward. Compromise doesn't work because no one fully supports the outcome, and neither does being backed into the corner. Imagine how high the proposed international government will reach if everyone is invited into the debate, and we storm the mountain.

I have kept your office informed of our progress in the creation of the proposed international government. It is normal to have active resistance to any plan from those who are in the second segment, and when they work with the fourth group, the resistance can become rebellious. The resistance ends when they see how they can get their financial support. Trump promised his supporters he would make America great (meaning prosperous) but the backbone of any economy is small business, and his plans only make the crisis worse. Our Lift the Public Plan, and economic stimulus plan that benefits everyone, can draw everyone into the plan for the international government. I gave a copy of our Lift the Public handout to Congressman DeFazio, originally in 2007, but also at his last townhall meeting in Brookings. 

My organization is hoping to start our Article V constitutional amendment drive in 2019. If you and Congressman DeFazio would like to overcome the coming economic crisis triggered by Trump's failed policy, please consider the Lift the Public Plan. It benefits everyone, including the lowest economic classes--the homeless and people on fixed incomes.

Tuesday, June 19, 2018

The Principle of Tolerance in US Law

This month, students of the Faith of the Pure Ray are focusing on the principles of Islam, and celebrating Ramadan, a time for setting aside the cares of the world and focusing on introspection on the principles of equality, and also tolerance and empowerment, and then creativity.

The favorite power game associated with Islam is terrorism, which is lashing out in anger when the Muslim sees someone who is not standing on the principles. Mankind always has three choices, and one is to stand on the principles, then another is to ignore the crisis and pass it on to future generations, and then one is to go down into the power games, which is the case of Muslims is terrorism--lashing out in anger. Ramadan, when observed based on its highest level, helps to clarify which option is the best.

Our Light Source Invention helps to clarify the importance of tolerance, which is on the opposite side of the planning circle from Islam. When people rise in protest, tolerance brings together everyone to come up with a plan that benefits everyone, and then the plan must stand on the principles of Christianity, which teaches creativity. Zero tolerance leads to more oppression--plans that benefit no one. 

(Our Tolerance brochure)

This month, the Trump administration has announced their policy of zero tolerance for illegal immigrants that are coming across the border asking for refuge. It has finally been revealed that Trump is using his policy, not to stand on the laws, but to back Congress into a corner to approve his immigration plan which includes the border wall. Previous attempts to introduce an immigration reform included a Muslim ban. 

Tolerance is the principle that brings the swinging pendulum back to the midpoint when there are acts of terrorism. The root cause of terrorism is that the people are denied a voice in their government, which is one of our unalienable rights granted to us by our Creator. Trump's policy of zero tolerance and a border wall won't solve the problem of terrorism. 

The Trump administration argues that they are just following the law, and this argument could stand in court, except that there is a misunderstanding in our legal system that is creating chaos.

Form email to Speaker of the House Paul Ryan on immigration June 17, 2018

There is a misunderstanding in our legal system that is causing chaos. Many people see two levels, when there are three (Principles, Power and Project) or Universal Law, constitutional law and federal law. 

Universal Law applies to every atom in the Universe, and that is where we get our unalienable rights. It stands on seven principles: equality, liberty, freedom, compassion, abundance, capacity and tolerance. When our government stands on only constitutional law and federal law, it can justify, even in court, oppressive power games. For example, the first requirement for conflict resolution is that both sides must be considered equal. If a court case is a mini-war, how can our government guarantee fairs trials if there is no equality under the law?

The Constitution is the Power aspect, and it is not fixed, but evolutionary and it evolves and devolves as Americans do. It addresses use of power when it delineates the duties and rights and privileges of elected officials, and when to remove them from power when they abuse their power.

Impeachment must be considered one of the Checks and Balances. When people are saying, "This is not America," then it is time to consider that what our elected officials are doing is an abuse of constitutional power, and that is an impeachable offense, because the House represents and will of the people and the Senate addresses the rights of the people. 

Tolerance is necessary to bring together everyone to create a plan that benefits everyone. Zero tolerance is unlawful, and an abuse of power. 

Monday, May 21, 2018

Why is Impeachment Such a Threat?

Impeachment has become a threat, something to be avoided at any cost, but when our founding fathers included "high crimes and misdemeanors" in the Constitution, they intended it to be one of the checks and balances. Impeachment doesn't have to lead to indictment. It can lead to a proverbial slap on the hand, and should be used anytime there is a question of whether an elected official has abused the power of the office. The Constitution delineates the rights, duties and privileges of the position, and also when to remove the elected official from office for abuse of power. 

It is not up to Congress to decide whether a law or practice is legal. The House of Representatives addresses the will of the people and the Senate addresses the rights of the people, and must stand on the rule of law, but it is up to the Judicial Branch to decide what is lawful. The US Supreme Court decides what they believe is Constitutional. The Executive Branch addresses whether laws and practices are executable. For example, the House of Representatives may vote to allow Americans to travel to the moon, that it is the will of the People, and the Senate votes on the rights to travel to the moon. The president decides whether that is something that is possible to accomplish, and if it is, signs it into law, or if not, vetoes the bill. If the law is protested, it will go into the courts to decide whether it is legal, and can be appealed all the way to the Supreme Court. Checks and balances between the Branches keep a sense of balance. 

All members of Congress and elected members of the Executive Branch swear an oath of office to the Constitution. Our Constitution is evolutionary, because it can be amended. Some of what was considered lawful in the 1700s, like slavery, is no longer lawful now. We evolved out of slavery in the 1860s. 

Slavery has always been against Universal Law, but slavery is more than just racism. The same crises occur on every level. It is a power game that is based on one of the five power games related to revenge. (We go deeper into the power games related to revenge in our Exit Strategy for Iraq proposal.) 

There are always three levels in the Universe--the principles, the power and the project--and three levels of the US legal system there are Universal Law, Constitutional Law and Federal Law. The US Constitution is the Power level, so it address the use of power and the abuse of power. 
Universal Law is where every person on the planet gets our unalienable rights. Our founding fathers declared, "We are endowed by our Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness." Our unalienable rights are to be able to live our lives without interference, to be treated fairly and equally, and to have a voice in our government.

Congress functions based on the will and the rights of the people, but the people are oftentimes left out of consideration. Governments deny the people a voice in matters of grave concern, and this leads to acts of terrorism as people raise their voices to be heard, oftentimes to the point of violence. When a nation is facing acts of massacres, such as school shootings, or terrorism, such as bombings or vehicles running down crowds of people on the streets, or wars, the power games are being played within the society. 

The preemptive strike on Iraq started an unlawful conflict that devolved as a genocide, but our Congress has yet to recognize the power grab that is still taking lives around the world. Ripples of effects went out from the grand lie that there were WMD in Iraq and Saddam Hussein could attack the United States with one with a half an hour notice. That war went against Universal Law, and it set the stage for the Trump administration to use the same failed policies. 

When the president of the United States talks about "fake news," he is telling us that a genocide is devolving within our nation. Genocides are also related to revenge, one of the two power games based on weaving an illusion. People who have been dragged into a genocide lack their liberty--their rights. President Trump's promise to undo everything Obama did while in office can be considered character defamation, an individual form of genocide, and an abuse of his power, and is therefore an impeachable offense. 

Wars are started by people who believe they are more important than others, and therefore they have the right to put others down. Trump's policy of maximum pressure is a businessman's tactic to take over other businesses that are floundering, but don't belong in the White House because this leads to wars, not peace. People who have been dragged into a war lack the principle of equality. The first requirement for conflict resolution is that both sides must be considered equal. If you consider a court case to be a mini-war, for a fair trial, both sides must be equal under the law. Trump's policy of maximum pressure is an abuse of power that will lead to perpetual war, and is an abuse of power, and is therefore an impeachable offense.

It may seem like the right thing to do to avoid impeaching the president for "high crimes and misdemeanors," but where would our country to today if our government had listened to the hundreds of thousands of peace protesters all over the world who protested the preemptive strike on Iraq? Why place our complete trust in the hands of one individual who is human, like the rest of us, and plays compensatory games that always backlash on us because they go against Universal Law? 

Monday, March 5, 2018

Our letter to the NRA (the National Rifle Association)

My organization is working to create an international government based on the US Constitution, and as of today, people in 85 nations support the plan for the international government. In 2011, the plan was leveraged to the world leaders through the diplomatic community in Washington DC. Before the Constitution can be used as the basis for the international government, certain laws and practices that create chaos in our legal system must be purified to prevent the chaos from spreading onto the international level. This is one of my organization's exempt purposes.

The international government will treat all nations the way the states are treated in the United States, and so disputes between nations will be resolved in court rather than the battlefield, and the monies wasted on war will go to the people instead. The only acceptable basis for an international court system is Universal law, because every atom in the Universe is subject to Universal Law, and every major religion is a cultural interpretation of Universal Law. No one would accept Sharia law, for example, as the basis of an international court system.

There is a misunderstanding in our legal system that we are addressing now, and it affects how our Constitutional Rights are interpreted. This misunderstanding has made it to the Supreme Court.

Most people see two levels to our legal system when there are actually three. The Universe always has three levels--the Principles, the Power and the Project. In religion, they are known as the Father, the Mother and the Son. In our legal system, they are Universal Law, Constitutional Law and Federal Law. Most people see only Constitutional Law and federal law, and this is what is leading to the chaos.

Universal law is immutable, and is based on seven principles: equality, liberty, freedom, compassion, abundance, capacity, and tolerance. These principles bring a swinging pendulum back to the straight and narrow. For example, people who have been dragged into a war lack equality, and the first requirement for conflict resolution is that everyone must be considered equal. If you consider a court case to be a mini-war, for a fair trial, both sides must be considered equal. People who have been dragged into a genocide, lack their liberty, and people who have been dragged into a massacre, based on covert and overt actions--like the school shootings--lack their freedoms.

Constitutional law is not fixed. It is evolutionary, and it is the power level, so it involves the use of power and the abuse of power. If you see only two levels, and the principles are left out, it swings the pendulum further out and people can justify playing power games that go against Universal Law. An act can be considered constitutional, but it is not lawful based on Universal Law. That is when an oppressive government can justify taking from the people our unalienable rights, to be able to live our lives without interference, to be treated fairly and equally, and to have a voice in our government.

Federal law must be based on a combination of both Universal Law and Constitutional law or it creates chaos in our legal system.

Your organization is working to protect our 2nd Amendment Rights bear arms to protect American freedoms, but there are some legal glitches in your justifications because they are based on this misunderstanding.

You are running an ad, for example, where a woman is about to burn a copy of the New York Times, but stops and calls what it prints to be fake news. Two power games are based on weaving an illusion--genocide and slavery. Once the grand lie has been told, the truth doesn't overcome the lie. It just reaches the point where no one knows who to trust. By undermining the New York Times, you are playing the power game of genocide, and denying others their liberty and taking away the Freedom of the Press, which can lead to massacres. You are breaking Universal Law of Cause and Effect, and that will lead to backlashes to your power games. 

Saturday, February 3, 2018

Was it a war, a genocide or a genocide?

Memo fever is epidemic in Washington DC, and today there is a question of whether Donald Trump will use the memo as the justification for firing Rod Rosenstein. As the president of the United States, he has the right to fire the the Deputy Attorney General of the United States, who is responsible for the special prosecutor, but it must be for cause. Does the newly declassified memo show cause? If it doesn't, Donald Trump can be impeached by Congress.

As this drama unfolds in Washington DC, let's all step back to another time, and compare this time period to the run-up to the Iraq War. According to our Light Source Invention, this is the third cycle, and the power games that are being played have reached their most extreme levels. North Korea has unified with South Korea for the Olympics, but can it last once the Olympics has ended? If Kim Jong Un is innocent now of the charges against him, it will collapse Donald Trump's justification to go to Congress for authorization to use military force.

President Bush went to Congress and received authorization to use military force against Saddam Hussein. Congress had voted to put sanctions on Iraq, and was monitoring whether the sanctions were working, so it should have come as a shock to them to hear that Saddam Hussein was working on his nuclear power program. Bush also went to the United Nations to draw together the support he needed to wage war on Iraq. He justified it with the vial of yellowcake from Niger.

It was a vial of yellowcake, a vial of yellowcake, and a vial of yellowcake, but did that vial of yellowcake prove that Saddam Hussein was rebuilding his nuclear power program, and had the intent to use his "newly manufactured nuclear weapons" against the United States? Was it the justification to preemptively strike Iraq?

George W. Bush declared Saddam Hussein to be "Axis of Evil," and he said "After all, he tried to kill my father." No one has the right to judge another, and this was an act of revenge for what he supposedly did to his father, George HW Bush. The judgment and revenge against Saddam Hussein means that the conflict devolved not as a war, but as a genocide, and it drew in his father, who believed he had the right to put Saddam Hussein down, which led to the Gulf War.

Genocides are based on weaving an illusion. The truth doesn't overcome the lie. It just reaches the point where no one knows who to trust. It created the schism between the Republicans and Democrats that is tearing apart Congress today. When no one knows who to trust, and only thing you can trust is Universal Law. It brings the swinging pendulum back to the straight and narrow.

Iraq and North Korea have not been treated equally in the United Nations, nor in U.S. foreign policy. Both The UN and US foreign policy have proven they cannot end or prevent wars, but have dragged mankind to the edge of the abyss that is nuclear war. The next step is to deny Iraq and North Korea  their unalienable rights, which are to be able to create their lives without interference, to be treated fairly and equally,  and to have a voice in their government. By doing that, under Universal Law, the people of the United States are facing the backlashes by losing our unalienable rights.

We are being backed into the corner by Russian interference in our elections. We cannot continue to be squeezed and we cannot come out of the corner fighting a greater force, which includes Russia and China. At this point, we are in a dilemma, and the solution to every dilemma is to turn around and go through the little door at the back of the corner. That is to do what is in everyone's best interest.

It is time for the people of the United States to join the debate on the plan for the international government. Today, we launch our U.S. Constitutional Amendment drive and will start gathering names on petitions for Congress to convene a Convention of States--an Article V amendment convention.

Next month, we will focus on Iraq, and we will assume responsibility for undoing the damage that was done when the United States invaded Iraq. 

Is it a memo, a memo or a memo?

This is the text of one of our posts on our organization Facebook page this morning. It is in response to an article about President Trump's tweet about the memo that Congressman Nunes wrote about the FBI's investigation into the Russian interference in the 2016 president election. 

Our organization recently sent a letter to the U.S. Supreme Court as part of our purifying the U.S. legal system aspect. It addresses a misunderstanding in our legal system that is based on the three levels of the Universe, which are the Principles, the Power and the Project--or the Potential, the Drive, and the Plan.
In regards to our federal legal system, they are Universal Law, Constitutional Law and Federal Law.
There are seven principles of Universal Law that bring a swinging pendulum back to the "straight and narrow": Equality, Liberty, Freedom, Compassion, Abundance, Capacity and Tolerance. For example, intolerance leads to the believe that you have the right to put others down, and that belief leads to wars. The principle that is lacking in wars is equality, and that is what brings the pendulum back to the straight and narrow. Any court must treat both sides equally to end the conflict. Universal Law is fixed and applies to every atom in the Universe.
Constitutional Law is the power perspective, and it is not fixed. it is evolutionary. It is the application of Universal Law in the United States, but when Universal Law is not regarded, and the President of the United States is playing power games rather than standing on the principles, the United States devolves. Religion is a cultural interpretation of Universal Law, and each of the seven major religion teaches one segment of the information necessary to create the life we want, but each also plays a favorite power games, so imagine this leads to wars and acts of terrorism. The application of Universal Law is not fixed.
Here we have an example of two interpretations of the same document. Donald Trump is saying it vindicates"Trump" in the probe, and the memo is a disgrace. But, when he says the memo is a disgrace, which level of the memo is he referring to? Is it the principles, the power or the project level of the memo? Is it a disgrace because it doesn't stand on the principles of all memos, is it a power grab by Nunes, or is the memo written poorly and with bad grammar?
The headline of this article says Donald Trump believes this memo will vindicate him, and implies he will take the next step to target the FBI. If that is the case, what will the courts decide?
This same crisis is going on in regards to our organization and the first step in the creation of the proposed international government. The first step of our Track Our Progress planning for each proposal involves bringing in the people, and for each, we must unravel the obfuscation that traps people in the illusion. We have been dealing with a character defamation campaign, which is an individual form of genocide, and genocides are based on weaving an illusion. The Iraq War devolved as a genocide, not a war, and genocides are based on weaving an illusion. The principle that brings the swinging pendulum back to the straight and narrow is Liberty--our unalienable rights. When governments can justify taking away anyone's unalienable rights, then the power game that is being played is genocide--based on the game of Envy.
When the illusion reaches the point where everyone is compromised and backed into the corner, the truth doesn't overcome the lie. The only thing you can trust at that point is Universal Law. That is the reason our organization sent the letter to the Supreme Court.

Monday, January 8, 2018

Your Power Base

In previous posts, I discussed the Light Source Invention, which demonstrates how the major crises around the world devolve from intolerance. Today, I would like to take that idea forward to how it affects one's power base.

This is a jpeg drawing, and so it cannot be translated. I will offer a narrative below that can be translated.

Your Power Base

Based on being:good, intelligent, attractive, etc...

Diagram #1  

You will eventually be backed into the corner.
"I am good," leads to the justification to put others down (genocide).
"I am intelligent" leads to slavery.
"I am successful," leads to massacres.
"I am powerful" leads to wars.


Based on everyone getting their life on a higher level and two principles, 
such s compassion and freedom...

It takes a great force to stop you.


Based on everyone getting their life on a higher level and seven principles....

You are unbeatable!