Monday, December 4, 2017

In regards to Today's Supreme Court Decision on Travel Ban

Mr Chin is the Attorney General for the State of Hawaii:

Insights on your Travel Ban Case:

Mr. Chin:

I am the founder and principal of a nonprofit organization that is working to create an international government based on the US Constitution, and before our constitution can be used as the basis for the proposed international government, we must purify the US legal system to keep laws and practices that create chaos within our legal system from spreading the chaos onto the international level.

May I offer you some insights on your travel ban case?

We believe misunderstandings have been introduced that create chaos, and one of the most important is that there are three levels of the Universe [not two]—the Principles, the Power and the Projects—and in our legal system, they are Universal Law, Constitutional Law and Federal Law. In religion, they are the Father, the Mother and the Son.

Universal Law fixes our legal system on a very high level because it is based on seven principles of equality, liberty, freedom, compassion, abundance, capacity and tolerance. Universal Law is immutable, and every atom in the Universe is subject to Universal Law. If this level is omitted from the laws and practices, the laws become contradictory, on either the letter of the law, which is a narrower perspective, or the intent of the law, which is wider.

Constitutional law is evolutionary, and it is the Power level, so it can be abused when people rely on power games, and in that case, our nation devolves.

Federal Law is the combination of both Universal Law and Constitutional law, so imagine what occurs when Universal Law is omitted and Constitutional Law is based on power games.

The seven principles Universal Law is based on bring disputes back to what religions call “the straight and narrow.” For example, when one individual, culture or nation is intolerant to others, the proverbial pendulum starts to swing, and a series of crises starts to devolve, leading to the extremes of wars, genocides and terrorism. The principles bring the pendulum back to the center point. Another way to look at it is the principle that ends a war is equality—or for a fair trial, both sides must be considered equal.

The knee-jerk reaction that ends a war makes a genocide worse. People who have been dragged into a genocide lack their unalienable rights.

In the case of the president’s travel ban, his attorneys are relying on Constitutional law to support his case, and your case is based on federal law, which makes the Supreme Court more likely to rule in the favor of the president. But, his travel ban is not based on Universal Law, which supersedes constitutional law, especially in cases that are international in nature. Every major religion is based on Universal Law, and Muslims stand in protest when they see someone who is not being treated fairly and equally, so this travel can that affect Muslims is making the United States less safe rather than more safe. They are not being treated fairly and equally, and are being denied their unalienable rights.

I cannot say how average Muslims will respond to the travel ban,  but the director of the CIA  has stated that there are ISIS sleeper cells in every nation, and the director of the FBI has stated that there are ISIS sleeper cells in very state, so banning Muslims from any nation will not stop them from waking up. As I said, people who have been dragged into a genocide, lack their unalienable rights, and it comes from a sense of judgment. By denying Muslims their unalienable rights, that can trigger a genocide.

Genocides are based on the power game known as Envy, which comes from a sense of judgment, and it is based on weaving an illusion. Once the Grand Lie is told, the truth doesn’t overcome the lie, it just reaches the point where no one knows who to trust, so fair trials are difficult to achieve when no one knows who is telling the truth. When the president of the United States talks about fake news, that is an indication that there is either a genocide devolving, or slavery—the other power game based on weaving an illusion. Character defamation is an individual form of genocide.  

By standing on Constitutional law, laws can be  determined to be legal by the Supreme Court, as part of the responsibility of the president, but are not necessarily lawful, based on Universal Law because no one has the right to deny others their unalienable rights. Under Universal Law what you do to another will be done to you, so there is always a backlash to the games. The president of the United States can “legally” set foreign policy practices that lead to genocide. They can be used to deny the people our unalienable rights to be able to live our lives without interference, to be treated fairly and equally, and to have a voice in our government.

Yours for peace,

Karen Holmes