Insights on your Travel Ban Case:
Mr. Chin:
I am the founder and principal of a nonprofit organization
that is working to create an international government based on the US
Constitution, and before our constitution can be used as the basis for the
proposed international government, we must purify the US legal system to keep
laws and practices that create chaos within our legal system from spreading the
chaos onto the international level.
May I offer you some insights on your travel ban case?
We believe misunderstandings have been introduced that create
chaos, and one of the most important is that there are three levels of the
Universe [not two]—the Principles, the Power and the Projects—and in our legal system,
they are Universal Law, Constitutional Law and Federal Law. In religion, they
are the Father, the Mother and the Son.
Universal Law fixes our legal system on a very high level
because it is based on seven principles of equality, liberty, freedom,
compassion, abundance, capacity and tolerance. Universal Law is immutable, and
every atom in the Universe is subject to Universal Law. If this level is
omitted from the laws and practices, the laws become contradictory, on either
the letter of the law, which is a narrower perspective, or the intent of the
law, which is wider.
Constitutional law is evolutionary, and it is the Power
level, so it can be abused when people rely on power games, and in that case,
our nation devolves.
Federal Law is the combination of both Universal Law and
Constitutional law, so imagine what occurs when Universal Law is omitted and
Constitutional Law is based on power games.
The seven principles Universal Law is based on bring
disputes back to what religions call “the straight and narrow.” For example,
when one individual, culture or nation is intolerant to others, the proverbial
pendulum starts to swing, and a series of crises starts to devolve, leading to
the extremes of wars, genocides and terrorism. The principles bring the
pendulum back to the center point. Another way to look at it is the principle
that ends a war is equality—or for a fair trial, both sides must be considered
equal.
The knee-jerk reaction that ends a war makes a genocide
worse. People who have been dragged into a genocide lack their unalienable
rights.
In the case of the president’s travel ban, his attorneys are
relying on Constitutional law to support his case, and your case is based on
federal law, which makes the Supreme Court more likely to rule in the favor of
the president. But, his travel ban is not based on Universal Law, which
supersedes constitutional law, especially in cases that are international in
nature. Every major religion is based on Universal Law, and Muslims stand in
protest when they see someone who is not being treated fairly and equally, so
this travel can that affect Muslims is making the United States less safe
rather than more safe. They are not being treated fairly and equally, and are
being denied their unalienable rights.
I cannot say how average Muslims will respond to the travel
ban, but the director of the CIA has stated that there are ISIS
sleeper cells in every nation, and the director of the FBI has stated that
there are ISIS sleeper cells in very state, so banning Muslims from any nation
will not stop them from waking up. As I said, people who have been dragged into
a genocide, lack their unalienable rights, and it comes from a sense of
judgment. By denying Muslims their unalienable rights, that can trigger a
genocide.
Genocides are based on the power game known as Envy, which
comes from a sense of judgment, and it is based on weaving an illusion. Once
the Grand Lie is told, the truth doesn’t overcome the lie, it just reaches the
point where no one knows who to trust, so fair trials are difficult to achieve
when no one knows who is telling the truth. When the president of the United
States talks about fake news, that is an indication that there is either a
genocide devolving, or slavery—the other power game based on weaving an
illusion. Character defamation is an individual form of genocide.
By standing on Constitutional law, laws can be
determined to be legal by the Supreme Court, as part of the responsibility of
the president, but are not necessarily lawful, based on Universal Law because
no one has the right to deny others their unalienable rights. Under Universal
Law what you do to another will be done to you, so there is always a backlash
to the games. The president of the United States can “legally” set foreign
policy practices that lead to genocide. They can be used to deny the people our
unalienable rights to be able to live our lives without interference, to be
treated fairly and equally, and to have a voice in our government.
